New Hope 360 Blog

Contador stripped of Tour win for doping, dietary supplements likely culprit

The bad news keeps coming for the supplement industry, as the doping blame for Tour de France winner Alberto Contador will likely fall on adulterated supplements.

Spain’s golden boy Alberto Contador—three-time winner of the Tour de France—was indicted on Feb. 6 by the Switzerland-based Court of Arbitration for Sport for using performance-enhancing drugs. He was stripped of his 2010 Tour win and is banned from professional competition until August 2012. During the 2010 Tour, Contador failed a drug test by testing positive for the performance-enhancing drug clenbuterol, often used for weight-loss and muscle-building.

Contador plays an unfortunately dirty sport—according to the New York Times, since 1995, only two Tour de France winners have avoided doping scandals—and when high-profile cases like these hit, it tends to reflect badly on the supplements industry.

Contador’s defense circled around a tainted veal cut, bought for him by a friend and brought to his hotel in France. Farmers have been known to give cattle clenbuterol to up meat production, though Spain is not known specifically to have a problem with clenbuterol adulteration.

The Swiss court threw out Contador’s tainted meat defense—as well as another theory that a blood transfusion was responsible—and consensus seems to be gathering around everybody’s favorite culprit, adulterated supplements. And not without good reason: Contador is apparently a sports supplement enthusiast, and tainted supplements (and poorly labeled supplements) have been behind numerous high-profile doping scandals—consider, for example, Major League Baseball’s BALCO scandal or the DMAA issue, which is popping professional athletes left and right.

Of course, the aspersions are usually cast widely across the entire supplement industry, which is a bad thing. But consumers don’t seem to be getting the message that supplements are a regulated industry. And lip service to self-policing doesn’t seem to have any effect on curbing ingredient scandals just waiting to happen. All this coming in the middle of regulatory limbo, as we wait for FDA to respond to NDI comments.

The bad news is stacking up against industry at a crucial time. Somebody please give me some good news to report.

Is industry headed for crisis? Tell me in the comments below.

Discuss this blog 5

Really??? Give me a break. In a sport where cheating is rampant. Of course they are going to say he got a batch of bad supplements or he was rubbing baby ointment on himself (Manny) or he didn't know that the bottle labeled super Juice from Balco Lab was illegal??

Really??

By rod (not verified)  on Feb 9, 2012

Really. The resonance and value of using the argument - 'I took a batch of bad supplements' - is what's really at stake. It's too easy an argument to make. It goes far beyond professional sports. It sounds too right to the average consumer. Dangerous question to ask, but I'll ask it: Is the lack of more stringent regulation -- pre-market approval, pharma trial standards -- actually one of the supplement industry's biggest hurdles? I don't know, but I do wonder.

When consumers say the supplement industry is unregulated, I don't think they mean it's unregulated. They mean it's not regulated well. They don't have sufficient confidence in industry, FDA, or anybody, for that matter, to go all-in on the proposition that natural ingredients & micronutrients will prevent disease better than traditional, common-sense approaches to food.

By marcbrush  on Feb 9, 2012

But let's also consider this: Supplements are a category of food & regulated (for the most part) as such. Take a common-sense approach to food & you still run the risk of contaminating your diet with clenbuterol, salmonella or listeria. Food's been around longer than supplements, so we trust it more, but it's equally "unregulated."

By connor.link  on Feb 9, 2012

Zing! Two points for Connor Link!
As soon as the FDA stops feeding me contaminated vegetables and meat they're welcome to worry about my vitamin D. Fact is, this isn't about safety, it's about money. Cynical? Maybe.

By nora.simmons  on Feb 9, 2012

What "unregulated" really means is "these pills don't work."

Fact is, the industry has failed to self-police.

Supps are every criminal's favorite alibi.

The category of sups, still, remains very, very safe, NDIs notwithstanding. FDA saying NDIs are all about safety when the proof is in 17 years of safe consumer use, is akin to using the "save the children" argument for whatever your golden goose is.

By Todd Runestad  on Feb 9, 2012
Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your New Hope 360 ID
(optional)
What's New Hope 360 Blog?

Your home for commentary from around the healthy lifestyle industry

Blog Archive