newhope360

Raw milk makes millions—should it be legal nationwide?

What is in this article?:

A new report shows that raw milk sales totaled $1 million for Vermont farmers last year, offering a compelling economic perspective that may overshadow current raw milk safety concerns.

Raw milk gained national attention this month following the illnesses of 43 people who consumed the product from The Family Cow dairy in Pennsylvania. But as the farm's sales resume after a government inspection, the setback seems not to have affected raw milk proponents who are currently working toward legalizing its sale in several states. 

The news of the raw milk recall comes at the same time when Rural Vermont released its 2012 report on raw milk production and sales. Raw milk sales generated $1 million in gross revenues for Vermont farms in 2011. Rural Vermont, a family farm and sustainable agriculture advocacy group, surveyed Vermont farmers who legally sell raw milk directly to consumers, thanks to a law passed three years ago.

Raw milk advocates already have legislation in progress in several states, including New Jersey, home to one of the outbreaks. Joining New Jersey are Indiana, Wisconsin and Kentucky. Idaho also proposed legislation to ease its strict rules on raw milk sales. In all, 15 states currently allow farms to legally sell unpasteurized milk, while 10 states permit retailers to sell it, according to Food Safety News.

The recent outbreak logs 36 confirmed cases of the potentially fatal Campylobacter infection in four states: Pennsylvania, Maryland, West Virginia and New Jersey. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration disallows raw milk transport across state lines, and has required the mandatory pasteurization of all milk and milk products intended for human consumption since 1987, noting that "raw milk, no matter how carefully produced, may be unsafe."

Discuss this article 6

There's two types of raw milk produced in this country, raw milk intended for human consumption and raw milk requiring sterilization and processing because it's not safe to drink.

Weston A. Price foundation has done a lot of work to educate consumers of the benefits of raw milk and the detriment of cooked (pasteurized) milk. See RealMilk.com for lots of great info.

Good health to you all! See you at Expo West in March!

By Ramona Family Naturals (not verified)  on Feb 8, 2012

If sales volume were a compelling reason for allowing a product to be sold, crack cocaine would be available in every vending machine.

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Feb 23, 2012

The whole point of the raw milk debate, in my eyes, is that raw milk is only safe if it's not done the way large agribusiness does it. The cows should be fed a natural healthy diet, kept in a clean environment, and taken out of production should an infection develop. The collecting process should be clean and the milk needs to be stored appropriately. This is going to be difficult to impossible to do correctly for large agribusiness. They rely on pasteurization and antibiotics to make their inferior product safe for human consumption. I would not trust raw milk shipped from far away - it is by necessity a local food... as it should be! But we'd all be healthier if we ditched the shelved, shipped products for local food anyway, so that's part of the healthy food movement, IMO. You take a risk with any food product - pasteurized milk can cause food borne illness, too... and it does, in greater numbers than raw milk has. Personally, I would not buy raw milk if I didn't know the farmer and had not visited the farm. I live in AZ and buy raw milk regularly - the owner of the dairy is readily available and she posts all the microbial tests openly at her dairy. I've visited the farm and had long discussions with the owner. This product is definitely buyer beware - but that should not stop anyone who wants a healthier natural product from getting it. It definitely should not be illegal.

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Feb 23, 2012

I just saw this USAToday link about a newly published, 13-year review of nonpasteurized dairy, conducted by the Centers for Disease Control. It indicates that raw milk DOES cause more illness than pasteurized milk: http://usat.ly/zeHu0r (The article also links to the study itself, appearing in the March2012 issue of Emerging Infectious Diseases.)
I agree that it's buyer beware, but it seems too risky to me.

By elisa.bosley  on Feb 27, 2012

What I'd like to know is the number of illnesses reported from people getting sick on conventional milk, to compare what the statistics really mean.

By sgp (not verified)  on Feb 23, 2012

I agree with and support LOCAL RAW MILK farms. I have been drinking raw milk for the past fourteen years on both coasts and never ever had a problem or concern.

The need for balanced reporting is essential here, the only way to fully understand these statistics is to know the statistics on contaminated pasteurized milk. It's really simple! But, they don't want you to know that part because the whole reason for pasteurization would be undermined.

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Feb 24, 2012
Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your New Hope 360 ID
(optional)