Natural Foods Merchandiser

New study identifies chemicals in pregnant women

What is in this article?:

Researchers at the University of California, San Francisco identified 163 chemicals—including phthalates, flame retardants and long-banned pesticides—in 268 pregnant women.

More About:

Pregnant women don’t drink, yet their bodies carry a cocktail of health-harming chemicals, a new study found. Researchers at the University of California, San Francisco identified 163 chemicals—including phthalates, flame retardants and long-banned pesticides—in blood and urine samples of 268 pregnant participants of the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey. While the UCSF analysis didn’t directly link these chemicals to health issues as several prior studies have, it is the first official tally of how many toxins pregnant women encounter.

The researchers chose to examine chemicals that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had previously detected in human blood and urine and that had shown in animal studies to be reproductive or developmental toxicants, said Ami Zota, PhD, coauthor of the study. “Many have not been examined extensively in human studies, but they’ve shown to harm the fetus in animal studies,” she said.

Researchers found phthalates, phenols, perchlorate, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), organochlorine pesticides (such as DDT), perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) and polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons in 99 percent to 100 percent of pregnant women. They identified bisphenol A (BPA) in 96 percent of participants, and the antibacterial triclosan in 87 percent.

While some of these toxins have been or are being phased out of widespread commercial and industrial use—such as DDT, which was banned in the U.S. in 1972—other chemicals are found in a wide range of consumer products, meaning pregnant women are exposed to them constantly. For instance, phthalates—endocrine-disrupting plasticizers and solvents that have been linked to behavioral and developmental problems in offspring of exposed pregnant women—are common in cosmetics, personal care products and all kinds of synthetic fragrances. BPA comes from cans, plastic bottles, thermal store receipts, food packaging and microwave popcorn bags, while toothpastes and antibacterial soaps and hand sanitizers can contain triclosan.

Discuss this article 2

As a retired biochemist I wish to caution that technology is advancing at a tremendous rate. We can detect chemicals at lower and lower concentration with every passing year. It is somewhat irresponsible to report such studies without mentioning the levels found. As we begin to detect chemicals at the part per trillion level we will naturally see more chemical, many of which are chemically insignificant and would be found in every living thing. It is important to report only significant findings in order for credibility to be maintained. If we loose credibility because of reporting trivial exposures and making then sound like they are significant, then how can we expect to be viewed reasonably later when a significant find is made?

By Retired Biochemist (not verified)  on Jan 27, 2011

Thank you for your insight. You raise a great point. However, in talking with various researchers both for this news story and for other reports on similar topics, they acknowledge that exposure levels to each individual chemical may not be troublesome, but repeated exposure--and exposure to so many different chemicals--can prove harmful. And what scares so many experts is that we just don't know what many of these longterm effects will be. So if there are ways to oust potentially harmful chemicals from commercial use, and if there are safer alternatives available, why not pursue them?

Thanks again for your thoughtful comments,
Melaina Juntti, Natural Foods Merchandiser

By Anonymous (not verified)  on Jan 31, 2011
Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your New Hope 360 ID
(optional)